I too think It's a good idea. I'm for it. Used to have one at Fiddlers, but now for some reason my Internet Explorer will not let me get on line with them. I wish I could.

Rob, I just posted this same reponse in the Workshop Notes section.  I have to agree with Deal's response there.  Subscription based plans are both good and bad.  Good in that one could, hopefully, pay less for models than if purchasing them individually.  Bad in that one would have no guarantee of new model availability, or the number of such, within the given subscription timeframe.  For your own online survival, against the masses of potentially miffed subscriptionists, it may be advisable to incorporate some sort of subscription guarantee.  For example, if you opt for going with a yearly subscription service, then you may need to guarantee a minimum of 1 new model every 2 months (every 8.67 weeks) so that the subscriber just overly breaks even, given the 14.95L yearly subscription price versus the 2.50L individual model price.  It may even be better to offer a minumum of 1 new model every 6 or 7 weeks.  This makes for a better offer for the subscription service, and it helps keep people coming back for at least a year's time.  Yes, it does put you on the hook, but it really should if you are going to offer such a service.  And what should the guarantee be?  Perhaps a refund of one half the subscription price, or a free subscription renewal, or free access to a certain number of already available downloable models.  Based upon how you craft the service, and the guarantee, this could be a good boon for your site, or a bust.